The Intersessional Working Group (ISWG) on Greenhouse Gases (GHG) ISWG-GHG 12 marks the third substantive discussion on mid-term measures (MTM), and the shift from phase 1 to phase 2 of the workplan adopted at MEPC76. The meeting concluded that there was now consensus to price GHG emissions at IMO. This is a major development – the concept of market-based measures (MBM’s) has been on the table at IMO for more than a decade and often debated with large disagreements between member states.
Dr Aly Shaw, Principal Consultant at UMAS said: ‘Growing consensus was achieved around the need for a basket of measures that would combine a technical element, e.g. a fuel standard, with an economic element, e.g. a MBM. There was also much support for a Well-to-Wake approach that reduces absolute emissions and puts shipping on a 1.5-aligned pathway. Perhaps most heartening was that the majority of members supported the need for an equitable transition that would leave none behind.’
Overall, good progress has been made in the first 12 months of IMO’s work on mid-term measures (policies to drive shipping’s transition and decarbonisation). The IMO is on track for the schedule it agreed last year and there is a lot of convergence about the objectives the final policy design will need to address.
Dr Tristan Smith, Director UMAS said: ‘To many, especially in industry, pricing GHG emission has been the obvious next step for a while. It is not a new concept to IMO, but previous attempts to progress it have failed. It is therefore a huge step forwards that there is now consensus on this. Pricing needs to be complemented with a mandatory measure like a fuel standard, but there is now a much improved potential for strong IMO incentivisation of shipping’s decarbonisation’
There are a range of possible policy mechanisms (technical measures like mandates and economic/market-based measures) which will now go through for further discussion, refinement and prioritisation.
Source: Hellenic Shipping News