As 2025 draws to a close, Europe’s ports and terminals are operating in a landscape where competitiveness, resilience, security and sustainability can no longer be treated as separate policy tracks, but as closely interconnected challenges shaping the future of Europe’s logistics and industrial backbone. Over the course of this year, one reality has stalled before our eyes and imposed itself: Europe’s strategic objectives — whether on climate, industrial policy or security — ultimately depend on the reliability of its supply chains. And supply chains depend, every day, on ports and terminals delivering performance under pressure.
This reality framed the discussions held during FEPORT’s General Assembly meeting in Brussels on 4 December which confirmed a shared conviction among FEPORT members: future EU Maritime Industrial and Ports Strategies must be coherent with one another and firmly anchored in operational reality. Ports are not abstract infrastructures; they are complex ecosystems where regulatory choices, investment conditions and daily operations directly affect Europe’s economic performance and strategic autonomy.
Throughout 2025, FEPORT has remained actively engaged across a broad range of policy files shaping this landscape. These include State aid rules, TEN-T implementation and funding priorities, customs reform and customs digitalisation, decarbonisation and energy transition, cybersecurity and digitalisation, economic security discussions linked to strategic investments, and military mobility. Behind these files, the same concern comes back again and again: private terminal operators are ready to invest and adapt, but long-term commitments require stable rules, proportionate obligations and funding frameworks that recognise both the commercial and the strategic value of port infrastructure and superstructure.
A good example is customs. The Union Customs Code has been moving steadily towards full digital implementation, and the political discussions on the broader customs reform have further highlighted how central ports are to the EU’s capacity to enforce rules while keeping trade flows moving. For terminal operators, the priority is straightforward: digitalisation must reduce friction, not add layers. Harmonised interpretations, workable interfaces between national systems, and a realistic transition period are essential. If implementation becomes fragmented, the price is paid in operational disruption, delays and a loss of predictability — exactly the opposite of what Europe needs at a time when supply chains are already under strain.
The same balancing act applies to the green transition. FEPORT fully supports the EU’s environmental and climate objectives and recognises the urgency of decarbonising transport. But 2025 has again shown that environmental ambition must go hand-in-hand with measures that preserve the competitiveness of Europe’s port and maritime industries. The rollout of onshore power supply, the electrification of terminal equipment, the integration of alternative fuels and the development of energy hubs all require massive investments, grid capacity and timely permitting. At the same time, EU-only measures such as ETS Maritime and FuelEU are increasing cost pressures and raising legitimate concerns about competitive distortions and cargo shifts towards neighbouring non-EU ports. If Europe wants its ports and terminals to remain investment leaders and partners in decarbonisation, it must ensure that policy design does not undermine the very industrial base that is needed to deliver the transition.
This is precisely why investment frameworks — and State aid policy in particular — have been so central to FEPORT’s engagement throughout the year. A dedicated EU State Aid Framework for Ports is not a technical request; it is a practical tool to make Europe’s objectives deliverable. Ports are being asked to invest in OPS, clean handling equipment, digital systems, cybersecurity, energy-related infrastructure, climate adaptation and, increasingly, dual-use capability. Many of these investments create broad societal benefits but limited direct commercial returns, and they often face market failures that private capital alone cannot solve. State aid rules that are predictable, coherent and adapted to the realities of port operations are therefore essential — not only for the energy transition, but also for resilience and security.
Resilience has indeed become a defining theme of 2025. Recent crises — COVID, geopolitical tensions, climate-related disruptions and cyber incidents — have underlined how essential ports are to the continuity of supply chains, energy systems and industrial activity. At the same time, Europe’s security environment has evolved markedly, with heightened concerns linked to its eastern flank and a broader reassessment of preparedness and strategic autonomy. In this context, ports are increasingly recognised not only as gateways for trade, but also as critical assets that must remain operational under all circumstances.
It is against this background that FEPORT welcomes the EU Military Mobility Package, including the Military Mobility Regulation, which provides an important framework to strengthen Europe’s ability to move personnel and equipment efficiently across borders. By recognising ports and terminals as critical nodes within the transport network, the Regulation supports better planning of dual-use infrastructure while reinforcing the overall resilience of the network. This momentum was further reflected in December, when the European Parliament adopted its report on military mobility, underlining the importance of investment, coordination and readiness across the transport system.
Looking ahead to 2026, FEPORT will continue to engage constructively with EU institutions, Member States and stakeholders to ensure that policy objectives translate into workable solutions on the ground. Our priorities are clear. We will advocate for coherent EU strategies that strengthen the competitiveness of Europe’s maritime and port ecosystem while supporting the green and digital transitions. We will continue to call for investment conditions that match the scale of the tasks ahead — through CEF and other EU instruments, but also through a State aid framework that enables Member States to act in a predictable and coordinated manner. We will push for pragmatic implementation of customs and digital rules that reduces burden and improves predictability. We will continue to emphasise cybersecurity, energy resilience and climate adaptation as essential building blocks of operational continuity. And we will remain fully engaged in the implementation of military mobility, ensuring that recognition of ports and terminals is accompanied by realistic funding and governance.
Strengthening security, improving resilience, advancing the energy transition and safeguarding competitiveness are not competing goals. They are mutually reinforcing—and they depend on coherent strategies, stable investment frameworks and sustained dialogue with those who operate Europe’s ports and terminals every day.
Source: FEPORT
